| 关于大调解之法理思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李广辉,孙永军.关于大调解之法理思考[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,18(3):46-52. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李广辉 孙永军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 汕头大学法学院,广东,汕头,515063
2. 河南大学法学院,河南,开封,475001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于转型期人民内部矛盾呈多元化、复杂化之势 ,司法实务界提出了有别于传统人民调解的调解模式———大调解。大调解的存在既有合理性 ,又有危险性。危险性的降低有赖于在保存大调解的基础上对其进行创造性改造 ,大调解的功能重新定位是改造的近路。大调解的功能应定位于既解决纠纷又保护权利 ,合理的纠纷解决体系的建构是必要的
|
| 关 键 词： | 大调解 合理性与危险性 功能定位 法理思考 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-4225(2002)03-0046-007 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年9月27日 |
Some jurisprudential considerations on grand conciliation |
| |
| LI Guanghui.Some jurisprudential considerations on grand conciliation[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2002,18(3):46-52. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Guanghui |
| |
| Abstract: | In view of the multiplicity and complexity of contradictions among the people during the restructure period,judicial circles have put forward a new conciliation model called the grand conciliation.This paper holds that it is both reasonable and dangerous to have such a grand conciliation.The way out is to retain its reasonable components and at the same time reform it through functional reorientation on the principle of both setting disputes and protecting legal rights.Also,this paper presents views on construction of a rational system for dispute settlement. |
| |
| Keywords: | grand conciliation rationality and danger functional orientation jurisprudential consideration |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
