论食品安全领域权利救济的预防性行政诉讼

从《食品安全法》中规定的或推定的权利救济途径来看，事后救济明显存在不足，预防性行政诉讼尤显必要。预防性行政诉讼的适用前提是明确其与尊重行政的首次性判断权、风险预防原则以及成熟原则的矛盾与联系问题。在食品安全领域，行政相对人在以下两种情况应该有权提起预防性行政诉讼：一是食品安全主管机关拟作出的责令停产停业、吊销许可证或执照、行政处罚决定；二是行政机关公布有毒有害食品信息可能对行政相对人造成不可弥补的损害。

On Preventive Administrative Litigation for Right Remedy of Food Safety

There are obvious shortcomings in“Food Safety Law”on the right relief provisions. Pre-ventive administrative litigation is particularly necessary. When applying the precautionary administra-tive litigation,we should be clear the relationships between“precautionary administrative litigation”, and“respect the principles of the first judgment of the executive”,“precautionary principle”,and“mature principle”. In the area of food safety,administrative counterpart in the following two cases should be entitled to institute preventive administrative litigation:first is that the food safety authorities proposed decision of administrative punishment such as ordered to cease,to revoke the permit or li-cense and administrative penalty,and second is that administrative authorities released food safety in-formation,which may cause irreparable damage to the administrative relative person.