Price bias and common practice in option pricing |
| |
Authors: | Jean-François Bégin Geneviève Gauthier |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Colombia, V5A 1S6 Canada;2. Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, H3T 2A7 Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Generally, the semiclosed-form option pricing formula for complex financial models depends on unobservable factors such as stochastic volatility and jump intensity. A popular practice is to use an estimate of these latent factors to compute the option price. However, in many situations this plug-and-play approximation does not yield the appropriate price. This article examines this bias and quantifies its impacts. We decompose the bias into terms that are related to the bias on the unobservable factors and to the precision of their point estimators. The approximated price is found to be highly biased when only the history of the stock price is used to recover the latent states. This bias is corrected when option prices are added to the sample used to recover the states' best estimate. We also show numerically that such a bias is propagated on calibrated parameters, leading to erroneous values. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 48: 8–35; 2020 © 2019 Statistical Society of Canada |
| |
Keywords: | Estimation bias information set jump-diffusions model calibration option pricing |
|
|