Unrepresentative Information: The Case of Newspaper Reporting on Campaign Finance |
| |
| Authors: | Ansolabehere, Stephen Snowberg, Erik C. Snyder, James M., Jr. |
| |
| Affiliation: | STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE is a professor of political science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; ERIK C. SNOWBERG is at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University; and JAMES M. SNYDER, JR., is a professor of political science and economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thanks to MIT librarian Anita Perkins who helped us liberate the Los Angeles Times from the grip of Media Conglomeration. The authors also thank the Carnegie Corporation for its support under the Carnegie Scholars program and Phillip Burrowes for his exceptional research assistance. Erik Snowberg would like to thank Dan Arnon and Mathieu Gagné for founding Oryxa, a company where I could earn my livelihood while still pursuing my life. Professor Ansolabehere and Professor Snyder thank the National Science Foundation for its financial support. All three authors thank Chappell Lawson for his helpful comments. |
| |
| Abstract: | ![]()
This article examines evidence of sampling or statistical biasin newspaper reporting on campaign finance. We compile all storiesfrom the five largest circulation newspapers in the United Statesthat mention a dollar amount for campaign expenditures, contributions,or receipts from 1996 to 2000. We compare these figures to thoserecorded by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The averagefigures reported in newspapers exceed the figures from the FECby as much as eightfold. Press reports also focus excessivelyon corporate contributions and soft money, rather than on themore common types of donorsindividualand typesof contributionshard money. We further find that thesebiases are reflected in public perceptions of money in elections.Survey respondents overstate the amount of money raised andthe share from different groups by roughly the amount foundin newspapers, and better-educated people (those most likelyto read newspapers) showed the greatest discrepancy betweentheir beliefs and the facts. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录！ |
|
