首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

大陆与港澳台仲裁保障和监督机制比较研究
引用本文:汪忠杰. 大陆与港澳台仲裁保障和监督机制比较研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2000, 2(4): 38-43
作者姓名:汪忠杰
作者单位:武汉科技大学,医学院,湖北,武汉,430080
摘    要:
仲裁制度作为解决民事纠纷的一种重要手段,在我国大陆及港澳台三地具体操作中有很大差异。具体表现在仲裁管辖权的保障、仲裁程序的保障和法院对仲裁裁决的承认和执行三个方面,还包括一系列制约机制的不同。只有把保障机制和制约机制有机地结合起来,才能够正确运用仲裁这种解决民事纠纷的形式。

关 键 词:大陆;港澳台;仲裁保障;监督机制;比较
文章编号:1009-3699(2000)04-0038-06
修稿时间:2000-09-04

A Comparison of the Arbitration Protection and Supervision Mechanism between Mainland China and Hongkong,Macao and Taiwan
WANG Zhong-jie. A Comparison of the Arbitration Protection and Supervision Mechanism between Mainland China and Hongkong,Macao and Taiwan[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2000, 2(4): 38-43
Authors:WANG Zhong-jie
Abstract:
The arbitration system,an important means of settling civil disputes, witnesses great differences in operation between the mainland China and Hongkong, Macao and Taiwan. Concretely speaking, these differences involve the aspects of the arbitration jurisdiction protection, the arbitration procedure protection and the recognition and execution of arbitration award by the court as well as a series of constraint mechanism. Only when the protection mechanism and the constraint mechanism are well coordinated can arbitration function properly as one of the means to settle civil disputes.
Keywords:mainland China  Hongkong   Macao   and Taiwan  protection of arbitration  supervision mechanism  comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号