由艺术的复制引发的法律尴尬——从"馒头血案"谈起

<一个馒头引发的血案>对<无极>的复制超出了<著作权法>规定的合理使用的范围,但在艺术上又是一种突破.此类带有创造性的复制使现行法律陷入了尴尬之中.复制实际上可分为单纯复制(剽窃、抄袭)与增殖复制(创造)两种,二者的区别有三:第一,使用方式或目的是否发生了转换是对二者进行区分的前提;第二,复制部分有无发生性质转换是区分两种复制的重要指标;第三,是否有作者对世界的个体化理解是区分两种复制的根本.重提艺术复制的意义在于,提醒人们不要忽视了艺术创作的另一个源泉--前人的经验和文本.

Embarrassment in Law Caused by Copying in Art:Starting from the Steamed Bread Murder Case

A Murder Caused By A Steamed Bread copies The Promise, which is beyond the scope of reasonable use according to the Copyright Law, but it is an artistic breakthrough.Such creative copy brings the law into embarrassment.Copying can be divided into simple copy(plagiarism)and proliferation copy(creation).There are three differences between simple copy and value-added copy: conversion of method and purpose being the presupposition;conversion of nature being the index; the author's individual understanding of the world being the fundamentality. The significance of discussing copying in art again is to remind people not to neglect another source of the artistic creation:the experience and texts of the predecessors.