首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

“权利泛化”是一个伪命题
引用本文:王荣余. “权利泛化”是一个伪命题[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 38(4): 140-148. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0598.2021.04.015
作者姓名:王荣余
作者单位:西南政法大学 行政法学院,重庆 401120
摘    要:权利泛化意指一种缺乏法权基础的社会现象,兼具描述性和规范性.强权利泛化命题主张权利泛化是一个伪命题,不仅因为它与权利膨胀、权利滥用以及权利冲突存在语义和语用上的区别,也因为权利泛化在正式法律场合不可能存在,而在公共辩论中也不是一个普遍的现象.由权利成本以及权利乌龙引发出的权利指责无论在道德还是政治层面都更难以对权利的内在价值构成挑战.每一次权利实践都是一次关于现代人的生存和生活方式的操练,作为一种警醒的权利泛化反而提醒我们要继续尊重和捍卫权利.

关 键 词:权利泛化  权利性条款  公共辩论  后果主义

The Generalization of Right Is a False Proposition
WANG Rong-yu. The Generalization of Right Is a False Proposition[J]. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition, 2021, 38(4): 140-148. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0598.2021.04.015
Authors:WANG Rong-yu
Affiliation:School of Administration Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China
Abstract:The generalization of right is a social phenomenon which is lacking the basis of legal domain and which covers both dimensions of descriptive and normative.Strong Generalization of Right thesis holds that the generalization of right is a false proposition not only because of the sematic and pragmatic distinction between it and Right Inflation,Right Abuse and Right Conflict but also it cannot exist in a formal legal situation.so it could not be a universal phenomenon in public debate.It is difficult to challenge the inner values of rights in both moral or political area coming from the blame caused by Right Cost and Right oolong.Each practice of rights is an exercise about the survival and lifestyle of modern people,the generalization of right as an alarm reminds us to respect and defend rights.
Keywords:the generalization of right   legal clause   public debate   consequentialism
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号