Are sociologists’ publications uncited? Citation rates of journal articles,chapters, and books |
| |
Authors: | David M. Bott Ph.D. candidate Lowell L. Hargens |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign;(2) Present address: Ohio State University, USA;(3) Department of Sociology, 326 Lincoln Hall, 702 S. Wright St., 61801 Urbana, IL |
| |
Abstract: | Critics argue that few sociological publications are cited in the subsequent literature and that this implies many are superfluous. Data on the number of citations to three kinds of sociological documents—journal articles, chapters in edited books, and books—show that a substantial majority of each type is cited in the subsequent literature. Furthermore, the high proportions of ever-cited items do not result from authors’ citation of their own work. Average citation levels of journals are highly correlated with other measures of journal stature. The average book is cited about as often as an average article in a highly-cited journal, while an average chapter in an edited book is cited about as often as an average article in an infrequently-cited journal. Within-journal variation in article citation rates far exceeds between-journal variation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|