| 论《还原脂砚斋》的片面性——驳欧阳健先生曲解有正本 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 童力群. 论《还原脂砚斋》的片面性——驳欧阳健先生曲解有正本[J]. 南都学坛, 2006, 26(1): 48-51 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 童力群 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 鄂州大学,学报编辑部,湖北,鄂州,436000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 戚沪本不是白文本,有正本上的狄氏批语有其来龙与去脉,有正本上的多半批语与狄氏无关。戚沪本早于程甲本,庚辰本早于有正本。讨论有正本的正文及批语,不能回避不利于程前脂后论的例子。讨论有正本的批语,必须涉及其底本戚沪本,必须兼顾大字本与小字本。只要全面正确地研究有正本,所谓“民国初年的脂砚斋依据有正本制造甲戌本、己卯本、庚辰本”的论点就不能成立。
|
| 关 键 词： | 有正本 批语 来源 影印 真相 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-6320（2006）01-0048-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-10-20 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-10-20 |
On the One- sided of Restoring Zhi Yanzhai--Discussing Mr. OUYANG Jian''''s Misinterpretation on Youzheng Edition |
| |
| TONG Li-qun. On the One- sided of Restoring Zhi Yanzhai--Discussing Mr. OUYANG Jian''''s Misinterpretation on Youzheng Edition[J]. Academic forum of nandu, 2006, 26(1): 48-51 |
| |
| Authors: | TONG Li-qun |
| |
| Abstract: | Qihu Edition is not the one without comments.Di's comment on Youzheng Editon has its cause and effect.Most of the comments have nothing to do with Di Pingzi.Qihu Edition is earlier than Chen's first Edition.The cases cannot be avoided that are disadvantageous to the wording that Chen's Edition is earlier than Zhi's.It must involve Qihu Edition(the master copy)to discuss the comments on Youzheng Edition,and must give consideration to both large-type edition and small-type edition.As long as studying Youzheng Edition integratedly and correctly,the argument is untenable that Zhi YanZhai made Jiaxu Editon,JiMao Edition and Gengchen Edtion from Youzheng Edition. |
| |
| Keywords: | Youzheng edition comments origin photomechanical printing truth |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
