| 时代诘问：报告文学的生或死——与黄浩、黄凡中先生讨论报告文学的生存权问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周淼龙. 时代诘问：报告文学的生或死——与黄浩、黄凡中先生讨论报告文学的生存权问题[J]. 云梦学刊, 2011, 32(1): 87-94 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周淼龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南理工学院,中国语言文学学院,湖南,岳阳,414006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 与黄文所持“报告文学的历史使命已经完成，我们有必要将它交还给历史”的观点相反，报告文学它只是处于暂时的低迷状态。保持信心，辉煌可待。黄文的基本假设及其逻辑是错误的。任何消极悲观，甚至幸灾乐祸地为报告文学唱挽歌．历史会证明这是一种草率或失态的表现!学术崇尚标新立异，但须建立在客观事实基础之上，不必篡改事实，耸人听闻。
|
| 关 键 词： | 报告文学 真实性 文学性 信息传播 接受期待 |
A HECKLE OF AN ERA:TO BE OR NOT TO BE!Discussion on the Right to Survival of Reportage with Mr.Huang Hao and Mr.Huang Fanzhong |
| |
| ZHOU Miao-long. A HECKLE OF AN ERA:TO BE OR NOT TO BE!Discussion on the Right to Survival of Reportage with Mr.Huang Hao and Mr.Huang Fanzhong[J]. Journal of Yunmeng, 2011, 32(1): 87-94 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Miao-long |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHOU Miao-long(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Hunan Institute of Science and Technology,Yueyang 414006,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Reportage is just in temporary downturn,rather than what Mr.Huang Hao and Mr.Huang Fanzhong states in their paper as Reportage has ended its historical mission and we should give it back to history. Keep confidence and splendor is expected.Their fundamental assumption and logic are obviously incorrect.History will prove that it is lack of seriousness and malpractice to take a passive and pessimistic attitude towards reportage.Pursuing difference and new ideas are always encouraged and worshipped in learning... |
| |
| Keywords: | reportage authenticity literariness information dissemination accepting expectation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
