首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从“简而有法”到“辞达而已”—论欧阳修与苏轼文章学的差异
引用本文:陆德海.从“简而有法”到“辞达而已”—论欧阳修与苏轼文章学的差异[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,35(4):21-25.
作者姓名:陆德海
作者单位:苏州科技学院人文学院 江苏苏州 215009
摘    要:欧阳修放苏轼“出一头地”之语, 反映了欧阳修清醒的认知:意识到苏轼文章思想与自己截然不同, 预感这个年轻后生的文学事业将是超越自己的别样存在。正当欧阳修引经据典为自己一生文章实践的理论总结“简而有法”说进行辩护时, 苏轼也恰好在文坛初露峥嵘, 别开生面, 倡导“随物赋形”, 将“无为法”引入“辞达而已”说, 使得“辞达而已”成为完全不同于欧阳修“简而有法”说的别一种文法论思想, 彻底摆脱了经学对于文章学的掌控。

关 键 词:欧阳修    苏轼    简而有法    辞达而已
收稿时间:2016-01-20

From "Organized Simplicity" to "Expressiveness": On Differences in Writing Theories Between Ou Yangxiu and Su Shi
LU De-hai.From "Organized Simplicity" to "Expressiveness": On Differences in Writing Theories Between Ou Yangxiu and Su Shi[J].Journal of Xihua University:Philosophy & Social Sciences,2016,35(4):21-25.
Authors:LU De-hai
Institution:School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215009, China
Abstract:When Ou Yangxiu said, "Su Shi standsout", he knew that Su's idea about writing was conspicuously different from that of his own and Su style would become an original existence in literary circle.While Ou was arguing for his writing theory "organized simplicity", Su was a rising star in the literary circle.He advocated "form based on objects" and "no fixed practice", that is, "just to be expressive".Different from "organized simplicity", "just to be expressive" tried to escape the dominance of Confucian studies over writing theories.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号