| 保障措施的实质要件及其实践之比较——以美国“201条款”和欧盟“3285,94号条例”为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 秦丽,胡勇.保障措施的实质要件及其实践之比较——以美国“201条款”和欧盟“3285,94号条例”为例[J].延边大学学报,2007,40(2):61-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 秦丽 胡勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学法律系 湖北武汉430079 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 实质要件的认定是保障措施适用的前提条件,然而,同为GATT/WTO成员方的美国和欧盟在认定保障措施实质要件的相关因素方面却存在差异。我国作为发展中国家,在进一步完善外贸立法时不应按照入世承诺对WTO相关规则进行全盘的移植,而应更多的借鉴美国和欧盟的立法思想和执法理念以保护我国产业。
|
| 关 键 词： | 保障措施 实质要件 美国"201条款" 欧盟3285/94号条例 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3311(2007)02-0061-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年1月12日 |
Trade Protection and Its Application——Comparison between "Section 201" and "Regulation No. 3285/94" |
| |
| QIN Li,HU Yong.Trade Protection and Its Application——Comparison between "Section 201" and "Regulation No. 3285/94"[J].Journal of Yanbian University(Social Sciences),2007,40(2):61-66. |
| |
| Authors: | QIN Li HU Yong |
| |
| Abstract: | The determination of substantive components in trade protection is a precondion of its application.There exist differences in terms of components determination between US and European Community,both of which are members of WTO.As a developing country,China should not totally transplant WTO rules during the process of perfecting its foreign trade laws.On the contrary,it should absorb the legislation thoughts and jurisdiction concepts from US,and European Community to protect better the national industries. |
| |
| Keywords: | protection measure substantive components Section 201 Regulation No 3285/94 |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
