20世纪红学研究历史的回顾——怎样读懂《红楼梦》的发展史

诸多事实说明,20世纪红学研究的历史实际是怎样读懂<红楼梦>的发展史.索隐派是对<红楼梦>的一种误读.新红学有功绩,但仍未读懂<红楼梦>.太愚的<红楼梦人物论>是从人物研究这个角度读懂<红楼梦>的著作.1954年批评俞平伯的<红楼梦>研究,是为了读懂这部伟大作品的斗争.何其芳的<论〈红楼梦〉>是读懂<红楼梦>的典范.1974年的"评红运动"是阴谋红学的大表演.冯其庸的<曹雪芹家世新考>是考证派的典范.张国光的"当代红学"批评周汝昌极端贬斥高鹗续书的意见,在世纪之交解决了读懂120回完整作品的重大问题.

The Review of the History about Research on the Studies of A Dream of Red Mansions in 20th Century--How to Understand the A Dream of Red Mansions

A large quantity of facts showed the history of studies on A Dream of Red Mansions was a phylogeny about how to spell over The Novel actually. The Suoyin School misunderstood The Novel. The new studies of The Novel had made achievement but had not spelt over it completely. Tai Yu' s Remark of the Characters in The Navel was a literature that was spelt over The Novel from the view of studying characters. In 1954 there was a discussion about criticism of Yu Ping-bo' s studies on The Novel in order to spell over the great novel. He Qi-fang' s the Comment on The Novel was an example about how to spell over The Novel. "the Movement of Commenting The Novel" was a performance made by the cabal of the studies of The Novel. Feng Qi-yong' s New Textual Research of the Family History of Coo Xue-qin was a apotheosis of the Textual Research School. Zhang Guo-guang criticized the viewpoint that Zhou Ru-chang denounced the book continued by Gao'e, which resolved the important issue about how to spell over The Novel.