首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论德国和苏俄民法典权利能力含义的区别
引用本文:邹爱华. 论德国和苏俄民法典权利能力含义的区别[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008, 35(3): 84-87
作者姓名:邹爱华
作者单位:湖北大学,政法与公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430062
摘    要:
在现代民法上,人格和权利能力是两个表示权利主体资格的概念,学术界对这两个概念之间关系的认识存在分歧,存在一致说和不一致说。导致分歧的根源在于对我国立法实践和理论研究产生巨大影响的《德国民法典》和《苏俄民法典》的权利能力含义不同。《德国民法典》的权利能力只有单一含义,即成为民事权利主体的资格,而《苏俄民法典》的权利能力有双重含义,即成为民事权利主体的资格及享有具体民事权利和承担具体民事义务的资格。

关 键 词:民法典  人格  权利能力
文章编号:1001-4799(2008)03-0084-04
修稿时间:2007-03-21

On the Different Implications of Right and Capacity between the German Civil Law Code and the USSR Civil Law Code
ZOU Ai-hua. On the Different Implications of Right and Capacity between the German Civil Law Code and the USSR Civil Law Code[J]. Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2008, 35(3): 84-87
Authors:ZOU Ai-hua
Abstract:
Concept of personality and right capacity are two terms to show subject qualification in modern civil law. There are different viewpoints on the relationship of two terms in academic circles, some think they are the same meaning, others object it. The root to cause different viewpoints is that there is different meaning of right capacity between Germany Civil Law Code and Civil Law Code of the USSR, which had an important influence on legislation practice and legal research in our country. The meaning of right capacity in Germany Civil Law Code is qualification to being a civil subject. The meaning is the same with personality. However, to right capacity, there are dual meanings in Civil Law Code of the USSR. One is qualification to being a civil subject; the other is qualification to enjoying specific rights and bearing particular duties.
Keywords:Civil Law Code  personality  right capacity
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
正在获取相似文献,请稍候...
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号