首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论侵权归责原则的内涵与外延
引用本文:刘清生.论侵权归责原则的内涵与外延[J].南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(3):56-61.
作者姓名:刘清生
作者单位:福州大学 法学院,福建,福州,350108
摘    要:对作为侵权法核心内容的归责原则学界理解不一,但归责原则的发展史就是归责原则内涵的体现史,究其历史可以发现,归责原则的实质是立法者追究行为人法律责任所依据的理由。无过错责任原则并非单个归责原则而是多个归责原则的概括,其中最为重要是危险责任原则。当前私法中,主要存在过错责任原则与危险责任原则,而这两原则之间是重叠交叉同时适用的关系。

关 键 词:归责原则  内涵  过错责任原则  危险责任原则  重叠适用  

On Connotation and Extension of the Imputation Principles in Tort
LIU Qing-sheng.On Connotation and Extension of the Imputation Principles in Tort[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics(Social Sciences),2009,11(3):56-61.
Authors:LIU Qing-sheng
Institution:Law School;Fuzhou University;Fuzhou;Fujian;350108;China
Abstract:People are different in understanding what the imputation principle is,and we should cognize the imputation principles by casting back their phylogeny,and then we can find that the imputation principle is just a reason that legislator makes the party respond."The liability for no fault" is not an imputation principle but consists of many imputation principles,in which the liability for abnormal jeopardy is an important one.Now there are two imputation principles in private law: the liability for fault and t...
Keywords:imputation principles  connotation  the liability for fault  the liability for abnormal jeopardy  being applied to tort at the same time  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号