首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

试论钱钟书"六法"失读说 --兼与"气韵生动"说商榷
引用本文:李洲良. 试论钱钟书"六法"失读说 --兼与"气韵生动"说商榷[J]. 学术交流, 2003, 0(4): 140-143
作者姓名:李洲良
作者单位:哈尔滨师范大学,人文学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080
摘    要:关于谢赫论画有“六法”的标点问题 ,存有两种不同的意见。钱钟书“六法”失读说 ,并从多方面进行了梳理和阐释。对当前较为流行的“气韵生动”说 ,在提出质疑的同时进行了较为细致的辨正。指出“气韵”比“气韵生动”更准确、周延、规范 ,更符合谢赫的本意

关 键 词:六法  气韵  生动
文章编号:1000-8284(2003)04-0140-04
修稿时间:2003-02-06

Tentatively on QIAN Zhongshu' s Theory of Re-arranging the Tone Clusters in "Six Techniques for Painting"--Concurrent]y on the theory of "lively artistic conception"
LI Zhou liang. Tentatively on QIAN Zhongshu' s Theory of Re-arranging the Tone Clusters in "Six Techniques for Painting"--Concurrent]y on the theory of "lively artistic conception"[J]. Academic Exchange, 2003, 0(4): 140-143
Authors:LI Zhou liang
Abstract:There are two viewpoints on punctuating the theory of "six techniques for painting" by Xie He. After arranging and expounding many materials, this paper prefers the theory on "six techniques" by Qian Zhongshu. In addition, the author analyzes a popular theory of "lively artistic conception" and raises his questions. He points out that "artistic conception" is more correct, standard and acceptable than "lively artistic conception", and more appropriate to Xie He's intention.
Keywords:six techniques for painting"  , artistic conception, lively,
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号