"得"字句研究札记三则

我们认为 ,“得”字句的语义、结构中心在“得”后成分上 ,所以“把墙刷得白”不能说 ,是因为“把”字句表示一种处置 ,其后的谓语必然蕴含着实现这一时体意义 ,而作为有“把”的“得”字句中心的“白”是单个性质形容词 ,本身不包含实现这一时体特征 ;我们对范晓先生《复动“V得”句》一文中的用三个平面观点解释一种“得”字句提出一点疑问 ;对张豫峰以博士论文为基础发表的两篇论文中的观点和学风问题进行了批评。

Three Reading Notes in the Study of the verb-Complement Construction with de

We argue that the semantic and structural focus of the verb-complement construction with de is on the elements that follow de , so the construction ba qiang shua de bai is not acceptable because the ba construction expresses a kind of disposal and the predicate following it is bound to contain an aspectual meaning "accomplishment" while bai as the focus of the de construction with ba is a single qualitative adjective which itself does not contain an aspectual feature of \!accomplishment\". We query the validity of the explanation of the de construction in terms of the three levels proposed in Fan Xiao's article "The V de construction" and criticize the points of view and academic style in the two articles based on Zhang Yufeng's doctoral dissertation.