| 论啖助、赵匡和陆淳《春秋》学的学术转型意义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 葛焕礼.论啖助、赵匡和陆淳《春秋》学的学术转型意义[J].文史哲,2005(5):40-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 葛焕礼 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学,宗教、科学与社会问题研究所,山东,济南,250100 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山东省社科规划项目“道教与唐宋思想文化的转型”(03CLJ01)成果之一 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 啖助、赵匡和陆淳《春秋》学的学术转型意义,除却人所熟知的尊经排传,而又兼采三传、变专门为通学外,更有着理念层面上的内容:独特的《春秋》宗旨说建立了经文义说的主体性;记实书法原则的运用开启了“汉”、“宋”经学义理依据的转化;重以义例解经极大地加强了经文解说的自主性;重以“讥贬之义”解经暗含着其论说立场的转变;强烈的现实关怀再建了《春秋》经世学统。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中唐 《春秋》学 学术转型 |
| 文章编号： | 0511-4721(2005)05-0040-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年6月26日 |
On the Significance of Dan Zhu, Zhao Kuang and Lu Chun's Studies of The Spring & Autumn Annals |
| |
| Ge Huan-li.On the Significance of Dan Zhu, Zhao Kuang and Lu Chun''''s Studies of The Spring & Autumn Annals[J].Journal of Literature,History and Philosophy,2005(5):40-45. |
| |
| Authors: | Ge Huan-li |
| |
| Abstract: | Apart from its well-known respect for the classic cannons,the significance of Dan Zhu,Zhao Kuang and Lu Chun’sstudies ofThe Spring and Autumn Annals,in the academic transformation is mainly theoretical;their peculiar explanation of thepurpose of the book establishes the subjectivity of new interpretation in terms of its implied meanings;the principle of realisticdocumentation ushers in the transformation of cannon studies in later dynasties;and the strong concern for society re-establishesthe practical tradition. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Middle Tang Dynasty Studies ofthe Spring and Autumn Annals Academic transformation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
