首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

违约精神损害赔偿研究——理论反思与制度建构
引用本文:刘廷华.违约精神损害赔偿研究——理论反思与制度建构[J].西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2011,12(3):137-141.
作者姓名:刘廷华
作者单位:宜宾学院,政府管理学院,四川,宜宾,644000
摘    要:对于违约精神损害赔偿,基于精神损害专属于侵权法、防止滥诉、难以量化、违反可预见性以及带有惩罚性等理由,目前的通说仍持反对意见。但以上理由无一成立。相反,违约精神损害赔偿完全符合合同法的立法宗旨,也是完善精神损害赔偿制度的必然要求,它能更好地保护当事人的合法权益,有利于鼓励交易;而且,英、美、德、法等很多国家的立法例都在一定范围内对违约精神损害赔偿予以承认。因此,我国也应允许违约精神损害赔偿,并在此基础上完善相关制度。

关 键 词:精神损害赔偿  侵权行为  侵权责任  违约责任  合同法  侵权法  归责原则

Compensation of Mental Damage for Breach of Contract——Theory Reflection and System Construction
LIU Ting-hua.Compensation of Mental Damage for Breach of Contract——Theory Reflection and System Construction[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong Universit(Social Science Edition),2011,12(3):137-141.
Authors:LIU Ting-hua
Institution:LIU Ting-hua(College of Government Administration,Yibin College,Yibin 644000,China)
Abstract:At present mental damages for breach of contract are classified exclusively as tort law issue and means of litigation prone to be abused,and they are deemed difficult to quantify,liable to be violated,and punitive.They are opposed by the main stream society in China.However,research shows that none of those reasons can be substantiated.On the contrary,mental damages for breach of contract are in full compliance with the legislative purpose of contract law,and it is necessary to improve the system of mental ...
Keywords:compensation of mental damages  breach of contract  liability for breach of contract  legitimate rights  contract law  tort law  principles of liability  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号