| 犯罪化标准的中外差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张红艳.犯罪化标准的中外差异[J].河南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009,27(4):93-96. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张红艳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南省政法管理干部学院,刑事法学系,河南,郑州450002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 不同法系对犯罪的评价不同,导致实质的犯罪概念存在着一些差别。法益侵害说作为犯罪的本质具有限制刑法调控范围的积极意义,它可以涵盖所有的犯罪。只有在探讨犯罪本质的同时,引入量化因素进入实质的犯罪概念之中,才能使立法者在决定犯罪的界限时有可以参考的基本标准。
|
| 关 键 词： | 犯罪化标准 犯罪概念 犯罪本质 |
The Different Standards of Crime between China and Foreign Countries |
| |
| ZHANG Hong-yan.The Different Standards of Crime between China and Foreign Countries[J].Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Social science,2009,27(4):93-96. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hong-yan |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Criminal Law;Henan Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law;Zhengzhou 450002;China |
| |
| Abstract: | There are some different concepts of crime in the different legal systems because of different political,legal or moral,social evaluation.The differences come from the comparison: 1.the theory of violating legal interests has the effect of limiting the scope of the regulation,which can cover all crimes.2.Legislators have the basic standard in deciding the limits of the crime only if exploring the nature of the crime with the introduction of quantitative factors into the essence of the concept of crime. |
| |
| Keywords: | standard of crime the concept of crime nature of crime |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
