| 论中国哲学“六经注我”的解释学方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姜华.论中国哲学“六经注我”的解释学方法[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(1):30-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姜华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 齐齐哈尔行政学院,黑龙江,齐齐哈尔,161005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “六经注我”是中国哲学的重要解释学方法之一 ,它不是要求人们忠实于解释客体 ,而是强调了解释主体的中心地位 ,展示了与人的类本质息息相关的解释主体对解释客体的主动性和再创造性。“六经注我”的解释学方法具有存在的合理性 ,但也包含深刻的奴性内蕴 ,限定不足的“六经注我”还容易导致解释过程的随意性和解释结果的虚假性
|
| 关 键 词： | “六经注我” 中国哲学 解释学 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2638(2004)01-0030-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年7月5日 |
On method of explanatory science of "the subfect annotation of the six classics" of Chinese philosophy |
| |
| JIANG Hua.On method of explanatory science of "the subfect annotation of the six classics" of Chinese philosophy[J].Journal of Qiqihar University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition),2004(1):30-32. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Hua |
| |
| Abstract: | the Subject Annotation of the Six Classics"is one of the main methods of explanatory science of Chinese philosophy.It does not demand object explanation but stresses subject explanation,which shows the activity and recreactivity for the subject explanation that links closely to the nature of human beings.There is reason in "the Subject Annotation of the Six Classics",but there is also profound servility in it.The underdefined Subject Annotation of the Six Classics is liable to the inclination of explanatory course and falseness of explanatory result. |
| |
| Keywords: | the subject anotation of the classics Chinese philosophy explanatory science |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
