| 程序自然法视域中法律解释的任务 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋小海.程序自然法视域中法律解释的任务[J].浙江社会科学,2011(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋小海 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江省社会科学院法学所,杭州,310007 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 一直以来,大陆法系关于法律解释目标或任务存在主观论、客观论和折衷说的分歧,难以解决.而实际上,富勒"程序自然法"学说蕴含了对该问题的答案.其"法律的公布"、"法律的明确性"和"官方行为和公布的规则之间的一致性"三项原则构成了法律文本的解释性准则,并由此决定了法律解释的任务是"重述"法律文本的公开性内容.即法律解释指向并限于法律文本;立法资料不能构成解释法律文本的依据;法律解释是且仅是对法律文本公开性内容的重述.这是属于客观主义的解释立场.
|
| 关 键 词： | 程序自然法 解释的任务 重述 公开性内容 |
The Role of Legal Interpretation in the Context of Procedural Natural Law |
| |
| Song Xiaohai.The Role of Legal Interpretation in the Context of Procedural Natural Law[J].Zhejiang Social Sciences,2011(6). |
| |
| Authors: | Song Xiaohai |
| |
| Institution: | Song Xiaohai(Department of Law,Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences,Hangzhou 310007) |
| |
| Abstract: | There are always different opinions including subjectivism,objectivism and eclecticism about the mission of law interpretation in civil law system.That divergence is not easy to resolve.However,Fuller's theory of procedural natural law implies the resolution to this divergence.The three principles of promulgation of laws,the definiteness of laws and the consistency between the official acts and the legal rules constitute interpretative canons of law texts.And the former interpretative canons determine the m... |
| |
| Keywords: | Procedural Natural Law Interpretative Mission Restating Publicized Content |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
