首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

物权和债权的优先效力需重新认识
引用本文:崔伟华.物权和债权的优先效力需重新认识[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(2):26-29.
作者姓名:崔伟华
作者单位:泰安中共市委党校,理论部,山东,泰安,271000
摘    要:物权的优先效力仅仅只是物权内部的优先效力。可以并存的物权以时间先后确定优先效力;限制物权优先于所有权;登记物权优先于未登记的物权;以占有为要件的物权优先于不以占有为要件的物权。债权内部也有优先效力问题。担保之债优先于独立之债;主债优先于从债;人身之债优先于财产之债。论证物权对债权有无优先效力,要在法理、逻辑和实践上都应讲得通。物权对债权并无优先效力。租赁(改称赁权)应是用益物权。

关 键 词:物权  债权  优先效力  租赁
文章编号:1008-7699(2007)02-0026-04
修稿时间:2007年5月11日

Rethinking Prior Virtue of Property Interest and Creditor's Rights
CUI Wei-hua.Rethinking Prior Virtue of Property Interest and Creditor''''s Rights[J].Journal of Shandong University of Sciences & Technology(Social Science),2007,9(2):26-29.
Authors:CUI Wei-hua
Abstract:The prior virtue of property interest is just that of its constituence.The priority of concurrent property interest is confirmed by the time;limited property interest precedes over ownership;property interest on record precedes over unrecorded one;property interest with important document of appropriation takes precedence of it that is not with.Prior virtue is within creditor' rights,too.The warranted obligation precedes over unattached obligation;prime obligation takes precedence of secondary obligation;person obligation precedes over estate obligation.We should make sense in legal principle,logic and practice so that we can demonstrate whether property interest is prior to creditor' rights or not.The present study proves that property interest is not prior to creditor's rights and that tenancy should be usufructuary right.
Keywords:property interest  creditor's rights  prior virtue  tenancy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号