首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

典权的死亡与再生——兼与张新宝教授商榷
引用本文:朱冰. 典权的死亡与再生——兼与张新宝教授商榷[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 5(3): 46-50
作者姓名:朱冰
作者单位:贵州大学,法学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
摘    要:
“典权废除论”往往从典权所谓的固有缺陷出发来论证典权制度的没落和消亡,没有看到这一问题的实质不是典权制度先天的不足或者缺陷,而是本土制度在西风东渐的立法体例下,如何很好衔接和融合的问题。由于典权具有相当的特殊性,试图用国外的理论来解释或者纳入其体系之下,总会显得生搬硬套与牵强附会,我们肯定典权在现有物权理论和立法实践中的困难,也考虑到现实的需要和可能,提出在商事特别法的方式下对这一古老制度进行发展和完善。

关 键 词:典权  废除论  商事特别法
文章编号:1671-7287(2006)03-0046-05
修稿时间:2006-03-18

The Death and Renewal of the Pawning Right: Discussion with Prof. Zhang Xinbao
Zhu Bing. The Death and Renewal of the Pawning Right: Discussion with Prof. Zhang Xinbao[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2006, 5(3): 46-50
Authors:Zhu Bing
Abstract:
According to the theory of abolishment about the pawning right institution, the institution has turned to be dwindled due to its inherent defect and limitation. However, the key of the issue on the pawning right is, as a traditional Chinese law institution, how the pawning right institution can consist with the current civil theory system rooted in western law system. In view of the need in practice and the possibility in theory, the archaic law institution should be developed by way of the special law on commerce.
Keywords:the pawning right  the theory of abolishment  the special law on commerce
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号