| 刑法司法解释:现状、成因及其走向 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 利子平,詹红星. 刑法司法解释:现状、成因及其走向[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2003, 34(6): 71-74 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 利子平 詹红星 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南昌大学,法学院,法律系,江西,南昌,330047
2. 韶关学院,法律系,广东,韶关,512005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国刑法司法解释存在解释权力的异化、解释主体的泛化、解释内容的分散化、解释效力的矛盾化等问题。目前,"两高"发布具有普遍效力的刑法司法解释具有其历史和现实的原因,但从应然性的角度看,刑法司法解释最终将还原成为一种司法技术。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法 司法解释 应然性 司法技术 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0448(2003)06-0071-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-06-10 |
Judicial Interpretation of Criminal Law:Its Present Situation, Reasons and Trendency |
| |
| LI Zi-ping,ZHAN Hong-xing. Judicial Interpretation of Criminal Law:Its Present Situation, Reasons and Trendency[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2003, 34(6): 71-74 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Zi-ping ZHAN Hong-xing |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Zi-ping~1,ZHAN Hong-xing~2 |
| |
| Abstract: | There are many problems in our judicial interpretation of criminal law such as variability of power,extension of the interpretation body,dispersion of the content,and contradiction of the efficiency.Nowadays,judicial interpretation of criminal law that the Supreme Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have promulgated has its historic and practical reasons,but in view of necessitarianism,it will revert to a judicial technology in the long run. |
| |
| Keywords: | our judicial interpretation of criminal law necessitarianism judicial technology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
