|
|||||
|
|
| 论养老保险基金筹集模式的帕累托改进 | |
| 引用本文： | 徐毅. 论养老保险基金筹集模式的帕累托改进[J]. 安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 13(1): 44-46 |
| 作者姓名： | 徐毅 |
| 作者单位： | 安徽财贸学院,金融系,安徽,蚌埠,233041 |
| 摘 要： | 尽管两岸政治制度和经济发展模式不同,但因农业在国计民生中所处的特殊地位,几十年来两岸始终将农业置于社会和经济发展的首位.由于两岸在政治、经济、文化、资源等的差异,因此,两岸农业发展政策有很大的差异,许多做法是可以相互学习和借鉴的. |
| 关 键 词： | 海峡两岸 农业政策 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-2463(2004)01-0039-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-05-10 |
On Pareto Improvement of the Aged -insurance Fund Raising Mode |
|
| XU Yi. On Pareto Improvement of the Aged -insurance Fund Raising Mode[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 13(1): 44-46 | |
| Authors: | XU Yi |
| Affiliation: | Dept. of Finance, Anhui College of Finance and Frade |
| Abstract: | Though the political systems and economic development mode are diffecerct,agriculture of both sides plays a special role in the national people's lives for tens of years.Owing to the differences in politcis,economy,culture and resources etc,there still exist great differences in agricultural development policy for China and Taiwan.But both sides can learn from each other in many respects. |
| Keywords: | both sides across the straits agricultural policy comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 | |