网约车规制路径比较研究——兼评交通运输部《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法(征求意见稿)》

网约车打破了旧有的利益格局，冲击了以特许经营基础的固有的监管机制。引发极大关注和争议。目前，各个国家对网约车采取的监管路径并不相同，新加坡采用注册为基础的备案管理，美国则专门创设了新型的交通网络公司的监督管理模式，英国通过司法途径，否认了网约车属于出租汽车的范畴，而将其纳入私人约租车监管体系之中，而以法国为代表的欧洲大陆许多国家，面对传统出租业者的压力，对网约车采取了严格的限制措施，甚至禁止其运营。在我国，如何在改革的前提下，根植于我国社会的现状，有效平衡各方利益，摒弃部门立法弊端，比较各国监管路径，在各地先行先试的基础上，通过委托立法形式，选择适当的监管路径。 

Legitimacy and Supervision System of Internet Private Hire Vehicles

Internet Private Hire Vehicles has clearly changed the way of people's travel and consumption habits, but also caused the attention and many disputes.In our country, less than a year's time, the game revolves around Internet Private Hire Vehicles has gone through several stages, especially at the beginning of 2015, traffic line departments throughout the special rectification action for the Internet Private Hire Vehicles carry out joint law enforcement at the local branch of the dynamic drag of public opinion whirlpool.We want to deeply root in China's current social situation, reference in the world other countries and regions on Internet car supervision methods, establish and perfect our country’ s supervision system of Internet Private Hire Vehicles.