| 安乐死非罪化的刑法研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蒋涛,苏文杰.安乐死非罪化的刑法研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,25(2):54-58. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蒋涛 苏文杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 大同大学政法学院,山西,大同,037009
2. 合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院,合肥,230009 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从阻却违法事由和非罪化理论两方面来说明安乐死的出罪问题,其中阻却违法事由是介于非罪与违法之间的一条界线,目的说和优越利益性是其免除非法性的两个理由,非犯罪化代表了刑事立法政策的一个方向——缩小刑法的干预范围。文章以大陆法系犯罪构成论的阻却违法事由及非罪化理论为依据,论述安乐死行为的出罪问题的合理性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 安乐死 阻却违法事由 非罪化 |
Research on Criminal Law on Decriminalization of Euthanasia |
| |
| JIANG Tao,SU Wen-jie.Research on Criminal Law on Decriminalization of Euthanasia[J].Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences),2011,25(2):54-58. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Tao SU Wen-jie |
| |
| Institution: | 1.School of Political Science and Law,Datong University,Datong 037009,China;2.School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The reason of not committing crime for euthanasia can be considered from two aspects: the claim preclusion of illegality and the decriminalization.The claim preclusion of illegality is a demarcation line between illegality or not,which uses the target theory and the theory of interests as its excuses.Decriminalization represents a tendency of the policy to criminal legislation,i.e.zooming out the intervention range of criminal law.This paper discusses the exoneration of euthanasia in light of the claim preclusion of illegality in the composing theory of continental legal system and the decriminalization. |
| |
| Keywords: | euthanasia claim preclusion of illegality decriminalization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
