首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

以他者话语质疑、批评"五四"文学非写实潮流--成仿吾对夏目漱石《文学论》的借用
引用本文:方长安.以他者话语质疑、批评"五四"文学非写实潮流--成仿吾对夏目漱石《文学论》的借用[J].武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004,57(4):551-556.
作者姓名:方长安
作者单位:武汉大学,文学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:创造社作家成仿吾以日本作家夏目漱石<文学论>的基本理论为内在话语,质疑、批评了"五四"文学一度出现的非写实潮流.他不仅以<文学论>关于情绪为文学中心的话语质疑"五四"初期诗坛尤其是小诗热,而且借<文学论>关于智的要素难以引起人之情绪的话语质疑、批评"五四"初期文学注重思想的哲学化倾向,还用<文学论>关于文学的真实性不同于科学真实性的话语质疑、否定"五四"文坛在自然主义文学影响下开始出现的庸俗化写实倾向. 在质疑、批评中,他努力探寻"五四"文学走出困境的方案.

关 键 词:成仿吾  
文章编号:1672-7320(2004)04-0551-06
修稿时间:2004年2月25日

To Suspect May 4th Literature According to Others Discourses
FANG Chang-an.To Suspect May 4th Literature According to Others Discourses[J].Wuhan University Journal (Social Sciences),2004,57(4):551-556.
Authors:FANG Chang-an
Abstract:As a writer of the Creator's Society,CHENG Fang-wu gave a strong suspicion against May 4th literature by quoting the discourses of On Literatures of Natsume Sosekei.Firstly, he doubted the world of early May 4th Poetry and the Little Poetry according to the theory of centering feeling on literature in On Literatures.Secondly, he criticized what early May 4th literature philosophize by quoting the discourses that one's sense can't rouse one's emotion of On Literatures.Thirdly, he according to the discourses of On Literatures on differences between truthfulness of literature and truthfulness of science denied the vulgar realism of May 4th literature that was caused by Japanese naturalism literature. So he searched after the way to extricate May 4th literature from the predicament.
Keywords:CHENG Fang-wu  On Literatures  suspect  May 4th literature  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号