| 中法物权变动模式比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓媛女.中法物权变动模式比较研究[J].湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版),2011,21(4):93-96. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓媛女 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙,410082 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 大陆法系各国对物权变动模式作出了不同的立法选择,包括以法国为代表的意思主义模式,以德国为代表的物权形式主义模式和以奥地利为代表的债权形式主义模式。我国现行的《物权法》确立了以债权形式主义模式为原则,以意思主义为例外的物权变动模式。中法两国基于不同的保护原则,确立了不同的变动模式。比较两国的变动模式,可以看出我国的模式利于保护交易的安全,法国的模式利于维护交易的便捷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 物权变动模式 债权形式主义模式 意思主义模式 交易安全 交易便捷 |
A Comparative Study of the French and Chinese Property Change Models |
| |
| Institution: | DENG Yuan-nü(School of Law,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The property change model in civil law countries results in different models of legislative options,including the French meaning doctrine model the German property for malism model,and the Austrian creditor formalism model. The Current Property Law of China establishes the principle of debt formalism model and the meaning changes in doctrine as an exception model. Based on the different principles in protection, China and France establish different change patterns. Comparing the two change models, we can see that China＇s model is conducive to protecting the security of transactions,while the French model is conducive to convenient transactions. |
| |
| Keywords: | property change model creditors formalism model meaning doctrine model transaction security convenient transactions |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
