首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

面向动态评价的长效机制及其构建研究
引用本文:黄诗童,赵希男,周岩.面向动态评价的长效机制及其构建研究[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(5):180-191.
作者姓名:黄诗童  赵希男  周岩
作者单位:1.海南大学管理学院,海南 海口570228; 2.特华博士后科研工作站,北京100029;3.东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁 沈阳110167
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271048,71901079,71961018);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助(N172410005-1);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(18YJC630270);海南省自然科学基金资助项目(721QN0874);海南大学科研基金资助项目(kyqd(sk)2124)
摘    要:事物的动态发展变化催生了对动态评价方法的需求。为解决动态评价中跨阶段动态可比性和对新增阶段的适应性等动态评价长效性需求问题,提出动态评价长效机制的构建原理。通过对数据标准化方式和多种评价方法的特征分析,在分析动态评价过程各环节技术的动态有效性基础上,从数据采集、数据标准化、评价方法的选择与使用等方面,基于线性加权模式下的竞优评析方法,构建了一种面向动态评价的“客观民主式”动态评价长效机制。最后,通过一个实例说明本研究在实际应用上的有效性。面向动态评价的长效评价机制为解决动态评价有效性问题提供了思路,可作为综合评价理论方法的一种有益补充。

关 键 词:动态评价  有效性  评价机制  长效集成原理  
收稿时间:2017-08-29
修稿时间:2018-06-01

Long-term Effective Mechanism and Construction for Dynamic Evaluation
HUANG Shi-tong,ZHAO Xi-nan,ZHOU Yan.Long-term Effective Mechanism and Construction for Dynamic Evaluation[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2022,30(5):180-191.
Authors:HUANG Shi-tong  ZHAO Xi-nan  ZHOU Yan
Institution:1. School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China;2. Tehua Postdoctoral Programme, Beijing 100029, China;3. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China
Abstract:The dynamic development of things increases the demand of dynamic evaluation methods. The static evaluation method solves problems of “utility measurement” and “ranking” that can be compared between the evaluated objects (decision making units).On the basis of the static evaluation, the dynamic evaluation method needs to solve the problem of comparing the evaluated objects’ “utility measurement” and “ranking” at their different periods. It requires the evaluation model and data standardization method possessing more long-term utility.At present, there are two widely used ways of dynamic evaluation: In the first one, according to the index information of each period, the traditional static evaluation is carried out to obtain the evaluated objects’ evaluation value, which is later utilized and processed to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value of various periods on multiple indexes of period.The second one integrates the index value of the evaluated object through the time synthesis on the index system, and then used the static evaluation method to get the final dynamic evaluation value. Both the dynamic evaluation ways need to determine the weight for the evaluation values of each time period.These two mentioned standardization methods, whether respectively standardized according to each time period, or standardized the data of several time periods, share the same problem of dynamic evaluation: the former one, which maps the data of each period to a unified interval, covers the overall differences of evaluated objects in each period, which may lose the compatibility and objectivity of the evaluation results of different period. The latter one, which can support the dynamic comparison between various periods, is sort of a “static” process that runs through these periods. Further, its evaluation result is only valid within the unified standardization of the various periods and is difficult to adapt to a new period. Therefore, although there are several methods of dynamic evaluation have been presented at present, there is still a lack of research on the analysis and construction of dynamic evaluation methods from the viewpoint of the effectiveness of dynamic evaluation. In this paper, a principle of building a long-term effective dynamic evaluation mechanism is put forward:based on judgment and processing of the long-term effectiveness of various evaluation techniques, this principle is composed of the classification of index types, the data standardization method of “datum period regression” which lacks the long-term effectiveness, and the selection of long-term effective evaluation methods, and integration of the overall evaluation mechanism.This paper is organized as following: Initially, the common evaluation data is classified into three types (natural data, social data related to money and artificial data obtained through expert consulting methods) and a long-term processing method for these data is put forward. Furthermore, a data standardization method called “datum period regression” is presented. Additionally, the Jingyou evaluation method based on linear weighted model is adopted to construct a dynamic evaluation mechanism of objective and democratic. Finally, a dynamic evaluation is conducted on technological innovation capability for four municipalities in China, by which the practical effectiveness of the result of this paper is proved. The evaluation method proposed by this paperenriches the comprehensive evaluation method and can be studied and applied more widely.
Keywords:dynamic evaluation  effectiveness  evaluation mechanism  long-term effective integration principle  
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号