| 试论法官调查取证与认证的分离 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴勇,杨翔.试论法官调查取证与认证的分离[J].湘潭大学学报,2001,25(2):65-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴勇 杨翔 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 湘潭大学法学院,
2. 湖南省司法厅, |
| |
| 摘 要： | 民事诉讼法院调查取证制度、质证制度和认证制度的构建及我国民事诉讼法官调查取证的实践弊端为法官调查取证与认证的分离提供了前提。“调认分离”的内容在于审判人员和调查取证人员的分离及其程序建设。调查人的双重法律地位决定了其要承担一定的民事责任。
|
| 关 键 词： | 调认分离 调查人的民事责任 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5981(2001)02-0065-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年12月12 |
On the Separation of Investigation of Evidenceand Certification of Judge |
| |
| WU Yong,YANG Xiang.On the Separation of Investigation of Evidenceand Certification of Judge[J].Journal Of XIANGTAN University:Philosophy And Social Sciences,2001,25(2):65-68. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Yong YANG Xiang |
| |
| Institution: | WU Yong 1,YANG Xiang 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | The promise is provided for the separation of investigation of evidence and certification of judge by the struture of court's system of investigation, cross-examination and certification and the practical weakness of investigation of judge. The content of “separation of investigation and certification”is the partition of judicial officer and inquiring officer, as well the building of procedure. The dual legal status of inquiring officer requires him to undertake civil legal duty to some extent. |
| |
| Keywords: | separation of investigation and certification civil legal duty of inquiring officer |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
