Why the Infinite Decision Puzzle is Puzzling |
| |
Authors: | Jeffrey A. Barrett Frank Arntzenius |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California-Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Pulier (2000, Theory and Decision 49: 291) and Machina (2000, Theory and Decision 49: 293) seek to dissolve the Barrett–Arntzenius infinite decision puzzle (1999, Theory and Decision 46: 101). The proposed dissolutions, however, are based on misunderstandings concerning how the puzzle works and the nature of supertasks more generally. We will describe the puzzle in a simplified form, address the recent misunderstandings, and describe possible morals for decision theory. |
| |
Keywords: | Dutch book Supertask Puzzle |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|