首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

试论王夫之对明代竟陵派的诗学思想的批评
引用本文:黄细梅.试论王夫之对明代竟陵派的诗学思想的批评[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(6):113-115.
作者姓名:黄细梅
作者单位:湖南科技大学人文学院,湖南,湘潭,411201
基金项目:湖南科技大学“中国古代文学与社会文化”省级重点研究基地成果
摘    要:王夫之对明代竞陵派进行了最严厉的批判,对他们几乎是全面否定。批判他们直承七子派的王、李,而不是公安派;批评他们标举性灵,而实际上根本不是性灵;并批评竞陵派的诗学主张“幽情单绪”,且认为他们的诗是“亡国之音”。王夫之厉批、痛诋竟陵派与其宣泄亡国耻辱和力挽大雅的诗学传统取向有关。

关 键 词:王夫之  竞陵派  批评  性灵  幽情单绪  亡国之音
文章编号:1673-0755(2007)06-0113-03
修稿时间:2007年6月12日

On Wang Fuzhi's Comments about Treatise of the Jingling School
HUANG Xi-mei.On Wang Fuzhi''s Comments about Treatise of the Jingling School[J].Journal of Nanhua University(Social Science Edition),2007,8(6):113-115.
Authors:HUANG Xi-mei
Institution:HUANG Xi- mei (Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China )
Abstract:Wang Fu-zhi made sharp comments on the Jingling school and almost disagree with them.He criticized they inherited the Seven-scholar School but not the Gongan school.They asserted natural inspiration;while in fact,they were not natural inspiration at all.Their poetry opinions were "exquisite feeling" and they were the sign of nation's subversion.These remarks are related with Wang Fu-zhi's playing out shame of nation's subversion and saving his elegance poetry tradition.
Keywords:Wang Fu-zhi  the Jingling school  criticize  inspiration exquisite feeling  the sign of nation's subversion
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号