去留街道办 |
| |
引用本文: | 本刊编辑部,杨敏,王运宝,贺海峰. 去留街道办[J]. 决策, 2011, 0(10) |
| |
作者姓名: | 本刊编辑部 杨敏 王运宝 贺海峰 |
| |
摘 要: | 【策划人语】原本低调的铜陵市社区综合体制改革,因为直指街道办事处的撤销,近期骤然升温,并引发诸多讨论:街道办是撤还是留?社区能否去行政化?如何平衡改革中各方利益关系?铜陵模式可否复制……诸如此类问题,促使我们对社区综合体制改革的观察,具有了多维视角。由此,本刊把关注点聚焦在改革源头——铜官山区。作为全国第一个、也是目前唯一的社区管理和服务创新实验区,发端于铜官山区的社区综合体制改革值得关注。
|
关 键 词: | 多维视角 行政化 利益关系 社区管理 铜陵市 街道办事处 铜官山 服务创新 策划人 体制改革 |
Jiedaoban,to be or not to be |
| |
Abstract: | The subdistrict administrative office,or jiedaoban,has been existed for more than 55 years.It has become unnecessary and unwanted these years as more and more of its duties have been taken over by other more efficient bodies in the urbanization process.The recent cancellation of a jiedaoban in Tongling,Anhui,marks the first step in the urban renovation of the system of self-governance of grass-root communities.It has stirred up heated debates over whether the body should be kept or vanish,and where should i... |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录! |
|