首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

合作式英文写作作用效度的实验分析
引用本文:卢植.合作式英文写作作用效度的实验分析[J].暨南学报,2004,26(2):104-108.
作者姓名:卢植
作者单位:暨南大学外国语学院 广东广州 510632
基金项目:暨南大学人文社科青年基金资助
摘    要:通过结构化程序教学实验,就合作式英文写作对英文写作质量的影响效度及学生对合作式写作的态度进行了研究。实验结果表明,实验组和对照组在实验后的写作测验成绩上表现出显著差异,合作式写作对于写作能力差的学生具有较大的促进作用,而对于写作能力强的学生促进作用不明显;两组学生都对合作写作持积极态度,对合作式写作给予正向评价;合作式写作在促进学生的课堂参与度方面具有积极作用。

关 键 词:合作式写作  独自写作  效度
文章编号:1000-5072(2004)02-0104-05
修稿时间:2003年8月22日

An Experimental Study on the Validity of Collaborative English Writing
LU Zhi College of Foreign Studies,Jinan University Guangzhou ,China.An Experimental Study on the Validity of Collaborative English Writing[J].Journal of Jinan University,2004,26(2):104-108.
Authors:LU Zhi College of Foreign Studies  Jinan University Guangzhou  China
Institution:LU Zhi College of Foreign Studies,Jinan University Guangzhou 510632,China
Abstract:The present research investigated the effects of a structured procedure for collaborative writing on the quality of English writing and the attitudes of students toward collaborative writing.Two classes participated in the research, and, each class contained an experimental group and a control group.Class A had an experimental group composed of the fixed roles with different abilities, whereas, Class B contained an experimental group composed of the reciprocal roles with the same abilities. Both groups took the collaborative writing. The training sessions were included in a 10-week experimental project. The quality of the individual writing before and after the project and the quality of collaborative writing during the project were analysed. It was indicated that, statistically, the difference between pre-project writing performance of the cross-ability group was significant, but it was not significant for its corresponding control group; the differences between pre-project and post-project writing performances of the same-ability group and its control group were not sinificant. The difference of writing performance in post-project testing between experimental and control group was significant. the participants in the two experimental groups showed the positive attitudes to the collaborative writing.
Keywords:collaborative writing  individual writing  analysis of composition  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号