| 关于法律推理研究的历史考察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 金承光.关于法律推理研究的历史考察[J].南都学坛,2003,23(5):86-89. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 金承光 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆,400031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 西南政法大学雍琦教授主持的重庆市“九·五”社会科学规划资助项目《法律适用中的逻辑》的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律推理的历史由来已久,西方各派法学家都不同程度地探讨过法律推理的有关问题,尽管他们的观点各异,但大多数法学家都倾向于认为法律推理就是法律适用的推理,它是法官裁决案件时的方法论工具或智力手段,其功能就是为了论证判决结论的正当性与合理性的。中国无论过去还是现在都还没有形成自己独立的、系统的法律推理理论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律推理 司法三段论 正当理由 方法论工具 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-6320(2003)05-0086-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年3月27日 |
Historical Study of Legal Reasoning |
| |
| JIN Cheng-guang.Historical Study of Legal Reasoning[J].Academic forum of nandu,2003,23(5):86-89. |
| |
| Authors: | JIN Cheng-guang |
| |
| Abstract: | The legal reasoning has been a long time and various groups of jurisprudents in Western countries have probed into the relevant issuses in varging degrees. Despite of their different views, the most of them have been prone to that legal reasoning is reasoning of adoption of law and is the methodological tool and intellectual manner of the judges for their decisions, its function is to demonstrate rationality of the decided cases. But in China there is no our own independent and systematic rationale of legal reasoning neither in present nor in the past. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal reasoning judicial syllogism justification methodological tool |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
