| 谬误研究的新修辞学视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马永侠.谬误研究的新修辞学视角[J].延安大学学报(社会科学版),2008,30(1):12-15,35. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马永侠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 榆林学院,中文系,陕西,榆林,719000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 1970年之后对汉布林批评的回应，催生了丰富多彩的谬误理论。新修辞学追随佩雷尔曼，不仅重新赋予修辞学严肃的使命，与不顾真理，唯求说服的旧修辞学划清界限，而且区分了研究论辩和谬误的三个视角：逻辑、辩证法和修辞学，主张以论辩过程为对象，以听众为核心构建谬误理论。谬误是似乎说服了但其实并没有说服一个普遍听众的论证。它只不过说服了一个特殊听众。
|
| 关 键 词： | 佩雷尔曼 谬误 新修辞学 作为产品的论证 作为程序的论证 作为过程的论证 听众 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9975(2008)01-0012-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年11月25 |
New Rhetoric Perspectives about Fallacy Studies |
| |
| MA Yong-xia.New Rhetoric Perspectives about Fallacy Studies[J].Journal of Yan'an University (Social Science Edition),2008,30(1):12-15,35. |
| |
| Authors: | MA Yong-xia |
| |
| Institution: | MA Yong - xia(Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Yulin College, Yulin, Shaanxi 719000) |
| |
| Abstract: | The response to Hambling criticism after 1970 bring about various tallacy theory, New rhetonc lollowed Perelman, giving the rhetoric to serious mission, and distinguishing new rhetoric from old rhetoric that disregard truth and only pursue persuasion. New rhetoric have distinguished among three distinct perspectives： Logic , Dialectics, and Rhetoric. New rhetoric regard argumentation process as objective of study, audiences as center, construcfing fallacy theory. A fallacious argument is one that seems to persuade a universal audience, but does not. Instead, it persuades only a particular audience. |
| |
| Keywords: | Chaim Perelman fallacies new rhetoric arguments as- product arguments as- procedure arguments as - process audiences |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
