首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中西古代监察制度之比较
引用本文:王晓天. 中西古代监察制度之比较[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 29(6): 8-11
作者姓名:王晓天
作者单位:湘潭大学,法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105;湖南省社会科学院,湖南,长沙,410003
摘    要:监察制度是对行政权力实行监督、制约的一种政治制度,是政治体系中不可缺少的组成部分,不同民族国 家的监察制度有其共同点。但是,中西古代监察制度是在不同历史背景和历史条件下发展起来的两大不同体系的 监察制度。因此,这两类监察制度在产生的时间和结果,行使监察权的主体和客体,所依据的理论,实施程序和惩 处方式,以及制度的性质诸方面存在各自的特点。比较中西古代监察制度,对建设我国当代的政治文明具有深刻 的借鉴意义。

关 键 词:监察制度  监察权  弹劾  政治文明
文章编号:1001-5981(2005)06-0008-04
修稿时间:2005-09-24

Comparison between Chinese and Western Ancient Institution of Supervision
WANG Xiao-tian. Comparison between Chinese and Western Ancient Institution of Supervision[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2005, 29(6): 8-11
Authors:WANG Xiao-tian
Abstract:As an indispensable constituent of political system, institution of supervision, which supervises and restricts the executive power, consists universal as well as different characters in different national states. Stemming from different historical conditions and contexts, Chinese and Western institutions of supervision differs in the time of development and its conscquency, in the subject and object of exerting supervising power, in the basis of theory, in the procedure of implementation and the model of punishment, and in the nature of institution. Comparing Chinese and Western ancient institution of supervision is of far - reaching influence on the construction of contemporary Chinese political civilization.
Keywords:the institution of supervision  supervisory power  impeach  political civilization  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号