文学史论楚辞兴起因缘之回顾探讨

今日台湾常见之九种中国文学史著作，在分析、探讨楚辞兴起之因缘时，有七种忽略了屈原对于“楚辞体”创造之重要地位，有一种对此论及之比重较少，只有王忠林等编写的《增订中国文学史初稿》对此论述得最为扼要、全面。结合当代楚辞研究的相关成果，反恩文学史针对此一议题之处理，有两点不容忽视：其一为楚辞名义问题，牵涉到作者采用的是广义或狭义的定义；其二为“南北之辨”，则是如何看待楚辞与南、北文化之间的渊源。

THE REVIEW ABOUT THE NARRATION OF THE ORIGINS OFCHUCI IN CHINESE LITERARY HISTORY

Based on several familiar works of Chinese literary History in Taiwan, when they analyzed the origins of Chu Ci, almost all of them ignored Qu Yuan as an important position to the creation of Chu Ci. Only one of them narrated it comprehensively. To compare the contemporary study of Chu Ci and reflect the narration of this theme, there are two points that cannot be ignored. The first one is the definition of ＂Chu Ci＂, and the second one is how to regard the relationships between Chu Ci and north and south culture.