| 理学与释"理"——试论戴震对朱熹学说的继承与扬弃 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈时凯.理学与释"理"——试论戴震对朱熹学说的继承与扬弃[J].合肥学院学报(社会科学版),2007,24(5):7-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈时凯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽日报报业集团,合肥,230061 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 朱熹之学与戴震之学最大的分歧在于对"理"的哲学阐释上。朱熹将"理"绝对化从而产生"理"的本体哲学,戴震将"理"纳入生活则形成了"理"的伦理哲学。戴震在对善、义、理、道等作阐释时态度谨慎,并无意指责程朱。
|
| 关 键 词： | 戴震 朱熹 理学 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-920X(2007)05-0007-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年5月28日 |
Neo-Confucianism and Interpretation of "Li"——On the Continuation and Sublation of Zhu Xi's Confucianism by Dai Zhen |
| |
| SHEN Shi-kai.Neo-Confucianism and Interpretation of "Li"——On the Continuation and Sublation of Zhu Xi''''s Confucianism by Dai Zhen[J].Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences,2007,24(5):7-14. |
| |
| Authors: | SHEN Shi-kai |
| |
| Abstract: | The sharp difference between Zhu Xi's Confucianism and Dai Zhen's lies in the philosophical interpretation of "li"(reason): Zhu Xi idealized it and formed the noumenal philosophy whereas Dai Zhen integrated it with life and formed the ethic philosophy of "li".Dai Zhen held a discreet attitude when interpreting the concepts of "shan"(benevolence),"yi"(justice),"li"(reason),and "dao"(morality),and had no intention to criticize Cheng-Zhu's Neo-Confucianism. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dai Zhen Zhu Xi Neo-Confucianism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
