首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论东海大陆架划界原则
引用本文:张万彬,张敏.论东海大陆架划界原则[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(2):51-55,94.
作者姓名:张万彬  张敏
作者单位:1. 大连理工大学法律系,辽宁,大连,116023
2. 中国政法大学,北京100088
基金项目:湖南省社科联立项课题(项目编号:0606011B
摘    要:由于对国际公约关于大陆架划界适用上立场不同,加之东海大陆架油气资源储量可观,中日两国在东海大陆架划界上存在着分歧。海洋划界需要有关国家通过协议实现公平解决,一国单方面确定国际海洋边界并将之强加于对方的行为是国际法所不许可的。日本所主张的“中间线”方法不构成划界的国际法规范,不具备约束力;中国所主张的“公平原则”,不仅是《联合国海洋法公约》明文规定的最基本的客观标准,也是国际司法实践确立的基本原则。

关 键 词:大陆架划界  等距离中间线  公平原则  自然延伸原则
文章编号:1009-105X(2007)02-0051-05
修稿时间:2007年3月7日

Principles in Delimitation of the Continental Shelf in East China Sea
ZHANG Wan-bin,ZHANG Min.Principles in Delimitation of the Continental Shelf in East China Sea[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences),2007,9(2):51-55,94.
Authors:ZHANG Wan-bin  ZHANG Min
Abstract:Due to the different positions for the delimitation of the continental shelf in international conventions,and the optimistic estimate of oil and natural gas resources in the continental shelf of East China Sea,there's divergence between China and Japan in the delimitation of the continental shelf of East China Sea.Maritime delimitation should be effected by an agreement between relevant countries with a view to equitable solution.Unilateral delimitation by one party is forbidden by international law.The stand of equidistant line by Japan is not binding because it doesn't conform to international legal norms therein;the equity principle held by China,however,is not only the basic criterion in UNCLOS,but also the basic rule in international practices.
Keywords:delimitation of continental shelf  equidistant line  equity principle  natural prolongation principle
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号