首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

走出“文学性”研究的二重误区——兼与余虹先生商榷
引用本文:洪进.走出“文学性”研究的二重误区——兼与余虹先生商榷[J].延边大学学报,2004,37(4):82-86.
作者姓名:洪进
作者单位:南开大学文学院中文系 天津300071
摘    要:当前流行的文学性研究并不是本体意义上的文学性研究,其实质是一种文化研究而与文学本体建构无关。当人们细致梳理西方形式主义文论中文学性概念的产生及其蔓延之后,就会发现,在后结构主义文论中,文学性概念即已泛化,而在后现代语境中,文学性研究更是转型为"文化化"阐述,所以当前亟待重建文学性的研究,但这种研究既不能在单独的形式审美维度上展开,也不能充当文化范畴中意识形态的阐述说明,而是在本体的审美建构中,融入主体的内在精神深度。

关 键 词:文学性  二重误区  形式主义  文化研究
文章编号:1009-3311(2004)04-0082-05
修稿时间:2004年9月15日

Clearing up Two misunderstandings in the Study of Literariness--Discussing with Mr.Yu Hong
HONG Jin.Clearing up Two misunderstandings in the Study of Literariness--Discussing with Mr.Yu Hong[J].Journal of Yanbian University(Social Sciences),2004,37(4):82-86.
Authors:HONG Jin
Abstract:Literariness is nowadays studied not as a thing-in-itself, but as an approach to culture, and consequently is isolated from the construction of literal body. The browsing of the western formalist literal theories about the formation and development of the concept of literariness shows that the concept of literariness has been extended in the literal theories of post-formalism, and transformed into the elaboration of culture in the postmodernist context. This situation demands the reconstruction of the study of literariness. However, it should be clarified that the study is not to be conducted in the aesthetic dimension of formalism and not to act as the representation of ideology, but to blend the internal spirits of the main body with the aesthetic construction of literariness.
Keywords:literariness  two misunderstandings  formalism  study of culture
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号