首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

试析康德“美的分析”四命题的独创性
引用本文:陈如.试析康德“美的分析”四命题的独创性[J].湛江师范学院学报,2008,29(5):16-19.
作者姓名:陈如
作者单位:中山大学,外国语学院,广东,广州,510275
摘    要:康德认为“审美”既不涉及概念,也不涉及任何法规,而是主观的行为。“审美”不涉利害,“美感”和“一般快感”以及“完善”不同之处,在于“美感”绝不涉及主体的欲望或需要。在此基础上,康德进而提出“审美”不经概念而具普遍性,“美”是在人类具有“共同感受力”的基础上“普遍可传达”的一种感受。同时,“审美”应该无目的而符合目的性,并具有不依赖概念的必然性。康德还通过对“纯粹美”和“依存美”的定义和比较,进一步开展对“理想美”的探求。

关 键 词:康德  审美判断  利害性  共同感受力  自由美  依存美

Creativity in the Four Propositions of Kant's Analysis of Beauty
CHEN Ru.Creativity in the Four Propositions of Kant''s Analysis of Beauty[J].Journal of Zhanjiang Normal College,2008,29(5):16-19.
Authors:CHEN Ru
Institution:CHEN Ru (School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510270, China)
Abstract:In his analysis of aesthetic judgment, Kant holds that a judgment of taste does not involve any concept or rule and was presented only as subjective, and that it is devoid of any interest or desire. On this basis Kant declares that the beautiful is what is presented without concepts as the object of a universal liking. He furthers his argument by proposing that a judgment of taste is based on nothing but the form of purposefulness of an object and that the condition for the necessity alleged by a judgment of taste is the idea of common sense. By comparing, distinguishing and defining free beauty and accessory beauty, Kant tries to nail down a precise definition and clear classification of ideal beauty.
Keywords:Kant  aesthetic judgment  interest  universal liking  free beauty  accessory beauty
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号