首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国对商标平行进口的法律对策——兼评长沙MICHELIN牌轮胎平行进口案
引用本文:严桂珍.论我国对商标平行进口的法律对策——兼评长沙MICHELIN牌轮胎平行进口案[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2012(3):116-124.
作者姓名:严桂珍
作者单位:同济大学法学院,上海,200092
摘    要:平行进口既与国家知识产权保护策略有关,也与国家的贸易利益有关。我国是贸易大国,对商标平行进口选择适用国际穷尽原则对我国最为有利。但在允许平行进口的同时,法律应当完善对消费者和商标权利人的保护。所以,当进口产品与国内权利人销售的产品存在实质性差异时,应当构成例外,允许权利人阻止平行进口;商标独占许可人一般未从平行进口商品的首次销售中获利,因而也应当允许其阻止平行进口。

关 键 词:平行进口  国内穷尽原则  国际穷尽原则  实质性差异

On China's Legal Strategy for Parallel Importation of Trade Mark Products — With Comments on MICHELIN Case
YAN Gui-zhen.On China's Legal Strategy for Parallel Importation of Trade Mark Products — With Comments on MICHELIN Case[J].Journal of Tongji University(Social Science Section),2012(3):116-124.
Authors:YAN Gui-zhen
Institution:YAN Gui-zhen Law School,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China
Abstract:Parallel importation relates not only to a state’s strategy for the protection of intellectual property rights,but also to its trade interests.China is a big trading state and therefore it is most advantageous for it to adopt the doctrine of international exhaustion for parallel importation of trade mark prodccts.However,China must improve its protection for consumers and trade mark holders when it allows parallel importation.Hence it must allow,as an exception,the right-holders to block parallel importation when there are substantial differences between imported products and those sold by domestic right-holders.An exclusive trade mark licensee should be permitted to block parallel importation as he normally has acquired nothing from the first sale of the paralleled imports.
Keywords:parallel importation  doctrine of domestic exhaustion  doctrine of international exhaustion  substantial difference
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号