唐律“不应得为”罪新探

“不应得为”罪历来颇受唐律研究者的关注,文章从唐代的法律文本层面和司法实践两个方面对该罪进行综合考察,并对目前学界的两个基本观点：1．“不应得为”罪主要是用来惩治违反封建价值观念的行为;2．“不应得为”罪打开擅断滥刑的闸门——提出了质疑,认为该罪名的设立是为了弥补律文的不足,使得唐律的逻辑体系更加完备,其在唐代的司法实践中也并未导致法官擅断局面的出现,因此笔者认为以往研究中对该罪名的认识是不全面的。

Research onOught Not To Do

Ought Not To Do is always regarded as an important topic to the scholars in studying Tang's Laws.For the indetermination of the law's rule,many scholars think it gave the biggest judicial privilege to judicial officials.The article doesn't intent to discuss that Chinese ancient law is the Nullum crimen sine lege,but analyze Ought Not To Do from a new viewpoint and draw a conclusion that former research that Ought Not To Do in Tang's Law is criminal monopolism is not objective.