首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


How to measure and proxy permanent income: evidence from Germany and the U.S.
Authors:David Brady  Marco Giesselmann  Ulrich Kohler  Anke Radenacker
Affiliation:1.School of Public Policy,University of California,Riverside,USA;2.WZB Berlin Social Science Center,Berlin,Germany;3.DIW Berlin,Berlin,Germany;4.Chemnitz University of Technology,Chemnitz,Germany;5.University of Potsdam,Potsdam,Germany;6.Hertie School of Governance,Berlin,Germany
Abstract:
Permanent income (PI) is an enduring concept in the social sciences and is highly relevant to the study of inequality. Nevertheless, there has been insufficient progress in measuring PI. We calculate a novel measure of PI with the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). Advancing beyond prior approaches, we define PI as the logged average of 20+ years of post-tax and post-transfer (“post-fisc”) real equivalized household income. We then assess how well various household- and individual-based measures of economic resources proxy PI. In both datasets, post-fisc household income is the best proxy. One random year of post-fisc household income explains about half of the variation in PI, and 2–5 years explain the vast majority of the variation. One year of post-fisc HH income even predicts PI better than 20+ years of individual labor market earnings or long-term net worth. By contrast, earnings, wealth, occupation, and class are weaker and less cross-nationally reliable proxies for PI. We also present strategies for proxying PI when HH post-fisc income data are unavailable, and show how post-fisc HH income proxies PI over the life cycle. In sum, we develop a novel approach to PI, systematically assess proxies for PI, and inform the measurement of economic resources more generally.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
正在获取相似文献,请稍候...
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号