首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国民间文物鉴定人管理现状及其规范
引用本文:岳业鹏,刘雅娟.我国民间文物鉴定人管理现状及其规范[J].沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,7(3):216-222.
作者姓名:岳业鹏  刘雅娟
作者单位:北京化工大学 文法学院, 北京 100029; 国家检察官学院 科研部, 北京 102206
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(12JJD820015);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(ZY1425).
摘    要:随着文物交易市场的不断繁荣,民间文物鉴定行业的发展也突飞猛进。由于我国目前尚无规范民间文物鉴定人的法律依据与行业管理机制,导致文物鉴定水平良莠不齐,严重影响到文物交易市场的发展。我国目前采取的行政干预方式进一步加剧了市场机制失灵的现象,应当在借鉴国外经验的基础上实行行业组织管理与明确法律责任的双重规范模式。建议确立民间文物鉴定人的市场主体地位,建构文物鉴定人的准入制度,并明确鉴定人应承担的法律责任。

关 键 词:文物交易  文物鉴定  民间文物鉴定人  准入制度  法律责任  比较研究  

Status quo and regulation of governance on private appraiser of cultural relics in China
YUE Ye-peng,LIU Ya-juan.Status quo and regulation of governance on private appraiser of cultural relics in China[J].Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2014,7(3):216-222.
Authors:YUE Ye-peng  LIU Ya-juan
Institution:School of Arts and Law, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; Departement of Scientific Research, National Prosecutors College of PRC, Beijing 102206, China
Abstract:Along with the prosperity of cultural relics exchange market, the industry of private cultural relic appraisal is developing rapidly. Because of the absence of legal basis and industrial management mechanism of regulating private appraiser of cultural relics in China, the level of cultural relics appraisal is uneven, which severely inflences the development of cultural relics market. The current approach of administrative intervention taken in China exacerbated the phenomenon of market mechanism failure. Dual regulating mode of trade organization management and legal liability specification should be implemented on the basis of referencing foreign experiences. It is suggested that the market subject position of private cultural relic appraiser should be established, the access institution of cultural relic appraiser should be built, and the legal liability of appraiser should be defined clearly.
Keywords:cultural relic trade  cultural relic appraisal  private appraiser of cultural relics  access institution  legal liability  comparative study
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号