首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

德中两国违宪审查制度之比较
引用本文:王宏亮,房蕊. 德中两国违宪审查制度之比较[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 56(2): 144-147
作者姓名:王宏亮  房蕊
作者单位:1. 山东广播电视大学,文法学院,山东,济南,250014
2. 中共山东省委党校科研处,山东,济南,250021
摘    要:德国的违宪审查制度是通过宪法法院这一专门审查机构来完成,而中国的违宪审查则属于立法机关的职能。中德两国违宪审查制度在审查主体、审查对象与方式、审查程序以及审查后果方面存在差异,我国违宪审查制度符合国情需要,但德国违宪审查制度中相对独立的审查体制与启动程序的制度设计,也值得我们借鉴吸收。

关 键 词:违宪审查制度  宪法诉讼制度  宪法法院

Unconstitutional Review System Comparison between China and Germany
Wang Hongliang,Fang Rui. Unconstitutional Review System Comparison between China and Germany[J]. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition), 2011, 56(2): 144-147
Authors:Wang Hongliang  Fang Rui
Affiliation:Wang Hongliang1,Fang Rui2(1.School of Humanities and Law,Shandong Radio & TV University,Jinan,Shandong 250014,2.The Party School of the CPC,Shandong Provincial Committee,Shandong,250021)
Abstract:Unconstitutional Review in Germany is completed by the specialized agency of Constitutional Court,while,in China,unconstitutional review is one of the functions of the legislature.Consequently there are differences between the review subject,review object and method,review process and review consequences.Unconstitutional review system of China meets its realistic conditions,but the independent judicial review system and the system design of the start process in the German system is worthy to be learned from...
Keywords:Unconstitutional Review  Constitutional Litigation  the Constitutional Court  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号