首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

一种基于一致性证据冲突的证据合成方法
引用本文:梁昌勇,叶春森,张恩桥.一种基于一致性证据冲突的证据合成方法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(4):152-157.
作者姓名:梁昌勇  叶春森  张恩桥
作者单位:1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥230009; 2. 安徽大学管理学院, 安徽合肥230039
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771037;70871034)
摘    要:针对Dempster-shafer证据合成结果与直觉决策认识之间的不一致性,提出一种新的证据合成规则。从决策的具体背景入手,描述Dempster-shafer证据合成公式产生悖论的两种情况,利用证据冲突的定义分析产生悖论的原因,提出基于一致性证据冲突的证据合成公式。该公式能减低决策中"一票否决制"和"众口烁金"等模式中决策信息放大或缩小而造成的误差。实例分析和实验结果表明,新的合成公式比较符合直观和常理,并较好地解决了上述冲突证据的合成问题。

关 键 词:证据理论  证据冲突  决策模式  合成悖论  
收稿时间:2009-9-3
修稿时间:2010-7-13

A New Method of Combination Rules of Evidences Based on Concordance Evidences Conflict
LIANG Chang-yong,YE Chun-sen,ZHANG En-qiao.A New Method of Combination Rules of Evidences Based on Concordance Evidences Conflict[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2010,18(4):152-157.
Authors:LIANG Chang-yong  YE Chun-sen  ZHANG En-qiao
Institution:1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; 2. School of Management, Anhuiu University, Hefei 230039, China
Abstract:Aiming to the problem of conflict from intuition decision making and the combination result of dempste-rshafer,a new combination rule was proposed in this paper based on the classes of evidence conflicts. The two types of absurdity were firstly presented according to demand of decision-making in real world,which are "one-vote-down system" and "public clamor can confound right and wrong". Some errors were analyzed,which is caused by the irrational definition of evidence conflicts in view of information streng thened or lessened1 Finally,two numerical examples and experiments were applied toil lustrate the validity of the proposed method.
Keywords:evidence theory  evidence conflict  decision-making pattern  absurdity of combination  
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号